header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

NLJ costs revision course (Pt 2)

nlj_7763_regan

This week, Dominic Regan addresses estimates & revisits the problem of incurred costs

  • A costs management order is always predicated upon the standard basis.
  • Merrix and Harrison show courts cannot depart from the agreed figure for estimated costs without good reason.
  • What to do about incurred costs is a lingering issue in costs management.

Budgeting is brilliant except when it isn’t. The concept whereby the proposed spend of each party is scrutinised at the outset is sound. Grandiose spending plans can be slapped down before the money is spent, before the damage is done.

In Merrix v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust [2017] 1 Costs LR 91 the crucial issue was the relationship between an approved budget at the outset and a detailed assessment at the conclusion of the same action. The defendant asserted that, while relevant, a budget was not conclusive and so a full blown detailed assessment remained essential. The receiving party understandably argued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll