header-logo header-logo

03 November 2017 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

NLJ costs revision course (Pt 4)

nlj_7768_regan

In his latest update, Dominic Regan tackles lateness, excuses & Denton

  • Applying the Denton test.
  • The saga of Redbourn Group v Fairgate Development.

Surely everyone knows that Denton v White (2014) 1 WLR 3926 is the definitive authority on how to approach an application for relief from a sanction?

However, subtleties abound and the decision in Redbourn Group Ltd v Fairgate Development Ltd [2017] EWHC 1223 (TCC) highlights a number of them.

The facts were simple. The claimant (C) secured judgment in default of service of a defence and counterclaim which were due on 25 January 2017. On 20 January, it sought an extension of time from the defendant who responded with an offer of seven days whereas C wanted 28 days.

Tragically, the defendant neither accepted the seven-day period nor did it apply at once to the court for more time. The period for which FDL had sought an extension expired at 4pm on 22 February. No defence or counterclaim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll