header-logo header-logo

NLJ costs revision course (Pt 4)

03 November 2017 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail
nlj_7768_regan

In his latest update, Dominic Regan tackles lateness, excuses & Denton

  • Applying the Denton test.
  • The saga of Redbourn Group v Fairgate Development.

Surely everyone knows that Denton v White (2014) 1 WLR 3926 is the definitive authority on how to approach an application for relief from a sanction?

However, subtleties abound and the decision in Redbourn Group Ltd v Fairgate Development Ltd [2017] EWHC 1223 (TCC) highlights a number of them.

The facts were simple. The claimant (C) secured judgment in default of service of a defence and counterclaim which were due on 25 January 2017. On 20 January, it sought an extension of time from the defendant who responded with an offer of seven days whereas C wanted 28 days.

Tragically, the defendant neither accepted the seven-day period nor did it apply at once to the court for more time. The period for which FDL had sought an extension expired at 4pm on 22 February. No defence or counterclaim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll