header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: AI in court—tool or trap?

224108
Writing in NLJ this week, Clare Hughes-Williams and Sam Kneebone, partners at DAC Beachcroft, warn that while artificial intelligence (AI) can boost efficiency, it also poses serious risks if misused

Recent UK and international cases show lawyers citing non-existent authorities generated by AI, leading to court sanctions and regulatory referrals. The authors stress that AI is not a substitute for human judgement and must be used with rigorous oversight. They recommend firms implement AI usage policies, compulsory training, and verification protocols.

Lawyers must always check AI-generated content against trusted sources before presenting it in court or to clients. The Solicitors Regulation Authority has already referred several practitioners for failing to do so.

The authors conclude that while AI offers cost savings and access to justice, it lacks empathy and experience—qualities only human lawyers can provide. Used wisely, AI is a powerful tool; used blindly, it’s a liability.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

mfg Solicitors—Hayley Pearce & Lauren Williams

Law firm mfg Solicitors announces promotions at Ludlow office

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson—Richard Sharpe

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints partner in Leeds residential team

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners—six promotions

Brabners adds six to partnership in record year for partner promotions

NEWS
The legal profession's AI challenge extends far beyond fabricated case citations, according to a warning about the next phase of technological risk
Law firms should use the transition period before the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumes anti-money laundering (AML) supervision to strengthen governance and compliance, experts have warned
Cross-border disputes increasingly demand creative approaches to gathering evidence, with litigators needing to look beyond traditional letters of request
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified the distinction between contracts of 'indefinite' and 'perpetual' duration, with potentially significant implications for commercial drafting
The Court of Appeal was entitled to uphold the government's decision to proscribe Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation, according to an analysis of the ruling
back-to-top-scroll