header-logo header-logo

30 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , International , Jurisdiction , Commercial , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Arbitral awards, state immunity & the need for express consent

220709
Do states need to give express consent to waive their immunity where an arbitral award is made against it? Yes, according to a recent case discussed in this week’s NLJ by Masood Ahmed, associate professor, University of Leicester, and Osman Mohammed, BA political science and international relations, University of Birmingham

Ahmed and Mohammed look at the intricacies involved in the recent decision of the Commercial Court in CC/Devas and others v The Republic of India. Here, the court was asked to determine whether a state waives its right to sovereign immunity and thereby submits to the adjudicative jurisdiction of the English courts because it has ratified the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.

Sir William Blair found in favour of India.

Ahmed and Mohammed write: ‘This decision is significant for the law and practice of international commercial arbitration. It illustrates some of the difficulties which may arise when a party is seeking to enforce an arbitral award against a state.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll