header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
30 May 2025 / Masood Ahmed , Osman Mohammed
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Jurisdiction , Arbitration , Commercial , International
printer mail-detail

State immunity & arbitral awards

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
220709
Masood Ahmed & Osman Mohammed consider whether states must give express consent to waive their immunity
  • The Commercial Court has held that state immunity is procedural, and enforcement of arbitral awards against states requires an express and unequivocal waiver of immunity.
  • This decision highlights the need for clear, written agreements from states waiving immunity in arbitration and enforcement proceedings to avoid legal barriers.

In the recent case of CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd and other companies v The Republic of India [2025] EWHC 964 (Comm), the Commercial Court was asked to determine whether a state waives its right to sovereign immunity under the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA 1978) and thereby submits to the adjudicative jurisdiction of the English courts because it has ratified the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (NYC).

The claimants commenced arbitration proceedings against the Republic of India in respect of India’s termination of a satellite communications contract. The claimants obtained an order from the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Renters’ Rights revolution begins—brace for tribunal chaos

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

NLJ this week: Civil procedure gets a spring overhaul
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
NLJ this week: Why GP complaints are going nowhere
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
NLJ this week: Prenups meet a jurisdictional brick wall
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
NLJ this week: Has Rylands v Fletcher come back from the dead?
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll