header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
30 May 2025 / Masood Ahmed , Osman Mohammed
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Jurisdiction , Arbitration , Commercial , International
printer mail-detail

State immunity & arbitral awards

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
220709
Masood Ahmed & Osman Mohammed consider whether states must give express consent to waive their immunity
  • The Commercial Court has held that state immunity is procedural, and enforcement of arbitral awards against states requires an express and unequivocal waiver of immunity.
  • This decision highlights the need for clear, written agreements from states waiving immunity in arbitration and enforcement proceedings to avoid legal barriers.

In the recent case of CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd and other companies v The Republic of India [2025] EWHC 964 (Comm), the Commercial Court was asked to determine whether a state waives its right to sovereign immunity under the State Immunity Act 1978 (SIA 1978) and thereby submits to the adjudicative jurisdiction of the English courts because it has ratified the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (NYC).

The claimants commenced arbitration proceedings against the Republic of India in respect of India’s termination of a satellite communications contract. The claimants obtained an order from the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll