header-logo header-logo

16 January 2026
Issue: 8145 / Categories: Legal News , Health , Human rights , Wills & Probate , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope

240110
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961

The article explains why prosecutions are rare but real, guided by DPP policy rather than immunity, and why inquests are increasingly the first legal reckoning for families and advisers alike. The civil consequences are just as stark: under the forfeiture rule, those who assist may lose inheritance rights unless courts exercise discretion.

Against this backdrop, the authors assess the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, now before the Lords, questioning whether its safeguards and reliance on medical judgement truly reflect modern medical reality. Until reform arrives, practitioners must navigate a regime that criminalises conduct many see as humane.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll