header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Breach a judgment embargo at your peril

01 November 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
195045

Lawyers who breach a judgment embargo face potentially serious consequences—particularly where a criminal case is concerned

Writing in this week’s NLJ, criminal solicitor David Bloom, associate director at Sonn Macmillan Walker Ltd, looks at a recent Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) case, in which ‘the court carried out an exacting (and doubtlessly excruciating for those concerned) examination of the events that led to two separate breaches of its embargoed judgment’.

The court set out principles for legal practitioners, including that there is no excuse for not understanding the system of sending draft judgments under embargo.

Bloom advises all chambers and firms to ensure they train staff and set out policies on embargoed judgments. His article includes a handy box of tips on what you can do, what you can’t do, and what you must do if there’s a leak.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll