header-logo header-logo

24 July 2026
Issue: 8171 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , International , Jurisdiction , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Email service pitfalls

Serving proceedings by email in international family disputes may appear straightforward, but it can create significant enforcement risks overseas

Writing in NLJ this week, Jennifer Brockington-Belli of Dawson Cornwell and Lucy Taylor of Coram Chambers examine the interaction between the Hague Service Convention, English procedural rules and Swiss law.

They warn that a method of service accepted by an English court may later fail in Switzerland if strict local requirements are not met.

Practitioners should treat service as a strategic issue, not a procedural formality, because it can affect jurisdiction, fairness and the enforceability of judgments years later.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll