header-logo header-logo

17 January 2025
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Fewer cases, less human rights, no criminal: the Supreme Court in 2024

203853
What went on at the Supreme Court in 2024? In this week’s NLJ, Brice Dickson, Emeritus Professor of Law, Queen’s University Belfast, reviews the cases, volume of work and topics covered in the past year.

Notable decisions included financial relief where a hugely wealthy Russian couple divorced, the extent of a doctor’s duty of care, and whether a water company could be sued for private nuisance for discharging untreated sewage into a canal.

The court decided 43 cases—less than usual, due to a reduction in the number of petitions to appeal (PTAs) granted. Dickson writes: ‘It is difficult to explain why so many PTAs are now being refused. The justices who sit on the PTA panels do not give reasons for their refusals beyond saying that the case in question does not raise an arguable point of law or a point of law of general public importance at this time.’

Looking ahead, Dickson notes the deputy president, Lord Hodge, intends to retire at the end of 2025. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll