header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Fewer cases, less human rights, no criminal: the Supreme Court in 2024

17 January 2025
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-detail
203853
What went on at the Supreme Court in 2024? In this week’s NLJ, Brice Dickson, Emeritus Professor of Law, Queen’s University Belfast, reviews the cases, volume of work and topics covered in the past year.

Notable decisions included financial relief where a hugely wealthy Russian couple divorced, the extent of a doctor’s duty of care, and whether a water company could be sued for private nuisance for discharging untreated sewage into a canal.

The court decided 43 cases—less than usual, due to a reduction in the number of petitions to appeal (PTAs) granted. Dickson writes: ‘It is difficult to explain why so many PTAs are now being refused. The justices who sit on the PTA panels do not give reasons for their refusals beyond saying that the case in question does not raise an arguable point of law or a point of law of general public importance at this time.’

Looking ahead, Dickson notes the deputy president, Lord Hodge, intends to retire at the end of 2025. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll