header-logo header-logo

17 January 2025
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Fewer cases, less human rights, no criminal: the Supreme Court in 2024

203853
What went on at the Supreme Court in 2024? In this week’s NLJ, Brice Dickson, Emeritus Professor of Law, Queen’s University Belfast, reviews the cases, volume of work and topics covered in the past year.

Notable decisions included financial relief where a hugely wealthy Russian couple divorced, the extent of a doctor’s duty of care, and whether a water company could be sued for private nuisance for discharging untreated sewage into a canal.

The court decided 43 cases—less than usual, due to a reduction in the number of petitions to appeal (PTAs) granted. Dickson writes: ‘It is difficult to explain why so many PTAs are now being refused. The justices who sit on the PTA panels do not give reasons for their refusals beyond saying that the case in question does not raise an arguable point of law or a point of law of general public importance at this time.’

Looking ahead, Dickson notes the deputy president, Lord Hodge, intends to retire at the end of 2025. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll