header-logo header-logo

25 July 2025
Issue: 8126 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Social Media , Child law , Media , Online safety
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Global platforms brace for UK’s sweeping online safety law

226388
Writing in NLJ this week, Lucy Blake, Joanna Ludlam, Will Jones and Karam Jardaneh of Jenner & Block unpack the far-reaching implications of the UK’s Online Safety Act 2023

The legislation, rolling out through 2025, imposes systemic duties on online platforms—including non-UK providers—to tackle illegal and harmful content, especially content affecting children. Ofcom’s enforcement powers include fines up to £18m or 10% of global turnover, service blocks, and criminal liability for executives. The Act’s extraterritorial scope means global companies must comply if UK users are at risk.

While not directly regulating disinformation, the Act mandates risk-based safety measures and age-appropriate protections. Ofcom’s codes of practice offer ‘safe harbour’ compliance routes, but alternative measures must prove equally effective.

With investigations already underway, companies face pressure to over-censor, risking free expression. The authors urge proactive compliance and close monitoring of Ofcom’s evolving guidance.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll