header-logo header-logo

01 August 2025
Issue: 8127 / Categories: Legal News , Financial services litigation , Insolvency , Regulatory , Compliance
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Insolvency practitioners—mind the regulatory gap

226818
Dan Moore, Richard Ellis and Jack Sears of Charles Russell Speechlys offer a vital guide for insolvency practitioners (IPs) navigating the UK’s financial services regulatory maze, in this week's NLJ

While IPs are generally excluded from needing FCA authorisation under Art 72H of the Regulated Activities Order 2001, the authors warn that this exclusion is narrow and fact-specific. Missteps—such as acting outside formal appointment or misunderstanding the scope of regulated activities—can trigger criminal liability under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

The article also highlights the importance of regulator consent when IPs are appointed over FCA-regulated firms, and the need to comply with client asset rules and conduct standards. A recent tribunal decision, Promethean Finance, underscores that exclusions are not blanket permissions.

The message is clear: IPs must tread carefully, seek legal advice when in doubt, and maintain open communication with regulators to avoid regulatory pitfalls.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll