header-logo header-logo

18 October 2024
Issue: 8090 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Mental health , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Litigation capacity & the role of the family lawyer

193151

How should family lawyers work with clients who lose or lack capacity?

In this week’s NLJ, Nicola Beasley, senior associate, Stowe Family Law, explains the concept of litigation capacity, differentiates between this and decision-making, and offers practice points for cases in which clients lose, or lack, litigation capacity.

Beasley covers case law on the topic and sets out clear, practical advice for lawyers involved in cases in which issues about a client’s litigation capacity arise.

The author writes: ‘As with mental health, litigation capacity can fluctuate.’ She also advises lawyers to remember that litigation capacity ‘is not based on whether the person’s decisions are unwise or unusual, or on whether you agree with them or not’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll