header-logo header-logo

18 October 2024
Issue: 8090 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Mental health , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Litigation capacity & the role of the family lawyer

193151

How should family lawyers work with clients who lose or lack capacity?

In this week’s NLJ, Nicola Beasley, senior associate, Stowe Family Law, explains the concept of litigation capacity, differentiates between this and decision-making, and offers practice points for cases in which clients lose, or lack, litigation capacity.

Beasley covers case law on the topic and sets out clear, practical advice for lawyers involved in cases in which issues about a client’s litigation capacity arise.

The author writes: ‘As with mental health, litigation capacity can fluctuate.’ She also advises lawyers to remember that litigation capacity ‘is not based on whether the person’s decisions are unwise or unusual, or on whether you agree with them or not’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll