header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Magna Carta—without the backlog

241900
Can ‘judgment by peers’ survive court modernisation? In NLJ this week, Janet Carter, retired barrister and HM Courts & Tribunals Service legal training manager, sets out a radical alternative to the government’s plan for ‘swift courts’

With magistrate shortages already acute, Carter argues that proposals to expand lay participation risk collapse. Instead, she suggests a specialist ‘trial-only’ magistrates’ panel to handle cases up to 18 months’ custody, freeing the Crown Court for more serious trials. The numbers are stark: nearly half of custodial sentences fall within that bracket.

Her model would widen recruitment, cut training burdens and slash delays, all while preserving peer judgment. Creating an intermediate court with judges sitting alone, she warns, would be ‘controversial and unnecessary’.

The prize is faster justice for victims and defendants alike—without abandoning the constitutional principle that trials should be decided by the community, not sidelined by systemic gridlock.

Issue: 8148 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll