header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Name the wrong firm, lose the right claim

225404
Clare Hughes-Williams and James Gardiner of DAC Beachcroft highlight the dangers of misidentifying defendants in negligence claims—especially after law firm mergers—in this week’s NLJ

In Leggett v AIG, the court ruled that liability does not automatically transfer to successor firms unless a clear novation agreement exists. Despite shared insurance, the LLP was not liable for pre-novation negligence by its predecessor. Claimants must carefully identify the correct legal entity or risk strike-out, as seen in Catton v County Solicitors, where a claim failed due to late substitution after the limitation period.

The authors stress that insurance arrangements do not determine liability, and successor status under indemnity policies does not ‘magically’ transfer responsibility. The takeaway: claimants must investigate firm histories and contractual relationships before issuing proceedings—or risk losing valid claims and facing costs consequences.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
A deputy costs judge correctly exercised his discretion to allow late service rather than strike out the point of dispute, the Court of Appeal has held
Prince Harry, Baroness Doreen Lawrence and five others have lost their case against the publisher of the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday and MailOnline, in Various Claimants v Associated Newspapers [2026] EWHC 1637 (KB)
Public confidence in the justice system is being undermined by a lack of accessible, useable data, magistrates have warned
The Sentencing Council has launched draft guidelines for facilitation and endangering another person during a sea crossing to the UK
Government proposals to make independent written legal advice a prerequisite for workplace non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) may prove unworkable, according to a senior employment lawyer
back-to-top-scroll