header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Stop sending mothers to prison

04 April 2025
Issue: 8111 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
214626
Imprisoning mothers has a devastating impact on more than the incarcerated. In this week’s NLJ, Rona Epstein explains the long-term effects on the mother’s children and urges the government to reconsider sentencing laws.

The Sentencing Council guideline—due to come into effect this week but accused of creating ‘two-tier’ sentencing and now suspended—would have been a step forward, Epstein writes. However, she suggests several other reforms, drawing some inspiration from jurisdictions abroad.

Epstein, an Honorary Research Fellow, Law School, Coventry University and Honorary Visiting Research Fellow at the Law School, University of York, lists the many health risks for both mother and child. She writes: ‘Sentencing a pregnant woman to prison means potentially causing her child significant developmental trauma due to separation. Evidence also shows that the additional stress that imprisoned pregnant women feel due to their environment can have a direct impact on the developing child and result in lifelong health and well-being challenges.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll