
Hayes and Palombo were jailed for conspiring to rig benchmark interest rates tied to contracts worth more than $300tn. But the UK’s highest court ruled their trials were fatally flawed: judges wrongly told juries that submissions influenced by commercial interests were inherently false, usurping the jury’s role to decide fact.
Lord Leggatt blasted both the Court of Appeal and the Serious Fraud Office for ‘perplexing’ errors and botched indictments. The decision threatens other rate-rigging verdicts and reignites debate over whether juries should handle sprawling financial fraud.