header-logo header-logo

11 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: What to do about FIDO? Pets after divorce

215636
Disputes over pets during divorce are on the rise. In this week’s NLJ, Shivi Rajput, partner at Stowe Family Law, looks at recent developments in the law.

Rajput writes: ‘The state of Alaska was the first in the US to require courts to consider the wellbeing of animals in divorce cases, empowering judges to award “joint custody” in a manner similar to child arrangements.

‘England and Wales may now be on the cusp of a similar shift, as evidenced by the recent case of FI v DO.’ This case, in the family courts last year, involved an acrimonious dispute over the family’s golden retriever.

Rajput covers the case in detail and suggests ideas for reform of the law, given the importance of pets in family life. 
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll