header-logo header-logo

11 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: What to do about FIDO? Pets after divorce

215636
Disputes over pets during divorce are on the rise. In this week’s NLJ, Shivi Rajput, partner at Stowe Family Law, looks at recent developments in the law.

Rajput writes: ‘The state of Alaska was the first in the US to require courts to consider the wellbeing of animals in divorce cases, empowering judges to award “joint custody” in a manner similar to child arrangements.

‘England and Wales may now be on the cusp of a similar shift, as evidenced by the recent case of FI v DO.’ This case, in the family courts last year, involved an acrimonious dispute over the family’s golden retriever.

Rajput covers the case in detail and suggests ideas for reform of the law, given the importance of pets in family life. 
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll