header-logo header-logo

11 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: What to do about FIDO? Pets after divorce

215636
Disputes over pets during divorce are on the rise. In this week’s NLJ, Shivi Rajput, partner at Stowe Family Law, looks at recent developments in the law.

Rajput writes: ‘The state of Alaska was the first in the US to require courts to consider the wellbeing of animals in divorce cases, empowering judges to award “joint custody” in a manner similar to child arrangements.

‘England and Wales may now be on the cusp of a similar shift, as evidenced by the recent case of FI v DO.’ This case, in the family courts last year, involved an acrimonious dispute over the family’s golden retriever.

Rajput covers the case in detail and suggests ideas for reform of the law, given the importance of pets in family life. 
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Animal welfare
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The government has pledged to ‘move fast’ to protect children from harm caused by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, and could impose limits on social media as early as the summer
All eyes will be on the Court of Appeal (or its YouTube livestream) next week as it sits to consider the controversial Mazur judgment
An NHS Foundation Trust breached a consultant’s contract by delegating an investigation into his knowledge of nurse Lucy Letby’s case
Draft guidance for schools on how to support gender-questioning pupils provides ‘more clarity’, but headteachers may still need legal advice, an education lawyer has said
Litigation funder Innsworth Capital, which funded behemoth opt-out action Merricks v Mastercard, can bring a judicial review, the High Court ruled last week
back-to-top-scroll