header-logo header-logo

21 October 2022
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Advice for employers on post-Harpur holiday pay

98022
The question of how to calculate holiday pay for workers on variable hours has been addressed by the Supreme Court decision in Harpur Trust v Brazel. 

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Excello Law partner Sarah King looks into the many implications of the case for employers, who may be confused about how to respond.

Some employers may want to move away from zero-hours contracts entirely, while others may choose to ensure zero-hours workers are given at least some work every week. King looks at the practical responses available to employers, and the factors they will need to weigh up.

She writes: ‘Employers must now change how they calculate holiday pay for these employees—seasonal, term-time only and zero hours contract staff—in order to comply with Harpur.’ 

See Sarah's article here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll