header-logo header-logo

21 October 2022
Issue: 7999 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Advice for employers on post-Harpur holiday pay

98022
The question of how to calculate holiday pay for workers on variable hours has been addressed by the Supreme Court decision in Harpur Trust v Brazel. 

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Excello Law partner Sarah King looks into the many implications of the case for employers, who may be confused about how to respond.

Some employers may want to move away from zero-hours contracts entirely, while others may choose to ensure zero-hours workers are given at least some work every week. King looks at the practical responses available to employers, and the factors they will need to weigh up.

She writes: ‘Employers must now change how they calculate holiday pay for these employees—seasonal, term-time only and zero hours contract staff—in order to comply with Harpur.’ 

See Sarah's article here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll