header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: The insider - An iron man, silk drawbacks they don’t tell you about, & three key cases in February

26 January 2024
Issue: 8056 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
154946

Professor Dominic Regan, aka NLJ’s The insider, has warm words for Sir Peter Fraser, the recently appointed Lord Justice

Sir Peter (who presided over the Bates v Post Office case) also answers to the name of ‘Iron Man’ (Regan reveals)—for other reasons apparently than his demeanour in court, as some readers might have wrongly assumed.

In this week’s NLJ, Regan will shock readers with news of an under-appreciated negative side-effect of silk appointment. All will be revealed in the column itself. Suffice to say, the professor recommends: ‘If you are lucky enough to be appointed, you should grab a pair of 80 denier tights as quickly as you can.’  

On a more serious note, Regan discusses three one-day-long appeals at the Supreme Court in February, ‘each of which is modest in value, but all of which have significant ramifications for the masses’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll