header-logo header-logo

26 January 2024
Issue: 8056 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The insider - An iron man, silk drawbacks they don’t tell you about, & three key cases in February

154946

Professor Dominic Regan, aka NLJ’s The insider, has warm words for Sir Peter Fraser, the recently appointed Lord Justice

Sir Peter (who presided over the Bates v Post Office case) also answers to the name of ‘Iron Man’ (Regan reveals)—for other reasons apparently than his demeanour in court, as some readers might have wrongly assumed.

In this week’s NLJ, Regan will shock readers with news of an under-appreciated negative side-effect of silk appointment. All will be revealed in the column itself. Suffice to say, the professor recommends: ‘If you are lucky enough to be appointed, you should grab a pair of 80 denier tights as quickly as you can.’  

On a more serious note, Regan discusses three one-day-long appeals at the Supreme Court in February, ‘each of which is modest in value, but all of which have significant ramifications for the masses’. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll