header-logo header-logo

02 July 2021
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Divorce is harder for farmers―particularly post-Brexit

52125
Dividing up the assets and income after a farming couple divorce is always hard but Brexit uncertainty has made it almost impossible, Hannah Porter, associate solicitor, The Family Law Company, writes in this week’s NLJ

The priority is usually to keep the farm intact. Post-Brexit, however, farms face an uncertain future not least because EU Common Agricultural Policy support has ceased and a seven-year transition scheme is now underway to bring in a scheme, not yet clarified, under the Agriculture Act 2020.

The changes could be dramatic, and possibly devastating for family businesses. This makes valuation problematic, for ‘figures from previous years may not reflect performance in the near future’, Porter writes. 
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll