header-logo header-logo

31 March 2023
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Five decades of family law reviewed

117285
Family law specialist, solicitor-advocate and commentator David Burrows looks back at his 50 years in family law, in this week’s NLJ. What’s changed? And how does the reality of some of those changes differ from what was originally envisaged? What could be improved?

Burrows, an NLJ columnist, looks back to the genesis of mediation which ‘we all thought’ would be government-funded. He reflects how his working life was ‘transformed’ by the Children Act 1989 and the Child Support Act 1991.

Burrows also questions the point of separate rules for family and civil proceedings. ‘Sometimes they are in parallel, sometimes they needlessly diverge. I am a fan of CPR 1998. But for the rule-makers to have created two sets of rules helps no one. And what is truly remarkable, the respective sets of rule-makers seem rarely to talk to one another.’ 

Read more on Burrows' 50 years in family law here.

Issue: 8019 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll