header-logo header-logo

31 March 2023
Issue: 8019 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Five decades of family law reviewed

117285
Family law specialist, solicitor-advocate and commentator David Burrows looks back at his 50 years in family law, in this week’s NLJ. What’s changed? And how does the reality of some of those changes differ from what was originally envisaged? What could be improved?

Burrows, an NLJ columnist, looks back to the genesis of mediation which ‘we all thought’ would be government-funded. He reflects how his working life was ‘transformed’ by the Children Act 1989 and the Child Support Act 1991.

Burrows also questions the point of separate rules for family and civil proceedings. ‘Sometimes they are in parallel, sometimes they needlessly diverge. I am a fan of CPR 1998. But for the rule-makers to have created two sets of rules helps no one. And what is truly remarkable, the respective sets of rule-makers seem rarely to talk to one another.’ 

Read more on Burrows' 50 years in family law here.

Issue: 8019 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Mediation
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll