header-logo header-logo

10 May 2024
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Gaps in employment law on detriment, whistleblowing & the Hogg rule

171886

Employment law brief in this week’s NLJ sees Professor Ian Smith dissect three recent cases that show lacunae in the law

The cases cover the law on detriment relating to industrial action incompatible with Convention rights, whistleblowing detriment, and termination by the employer and the rule in Hogg v Dover College.

On the third case, Professor Smith, of the Norwich Law School, UEA, writes that it raised a question as to how the rule in Hogg interacts with a common law action for wages. He notes: ‘The case is obviously an untypical one. Normally in a case of forced changes, an employer would not wish to open the can of worms called Hogg which could, while saving it a few bob in wages, expose it to a much more embarrassing and costly unfair dismissal action.’

Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Tribunals
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll