header-logo header-logo

05 May 2023
Issue: 8023 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Profession , CPR
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: How to win at disclosure & avoid sanctions

120980
The courts expect greater cooperation from parties on disclosure and judges are imposing tougher sanctions for non-compliance. 

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Natalie Osafo and Joseph Rossello, both senior associates at Stewarts, review what the courts expect from parties litigating cases under the new disclosure regime (Practice Direction 57AD).

As Osafo and Rossello write, it’s time for practitioners to familiarise themselves with the disclosure rules if they have not done so already, as ‘we are already seeing judges respond with more severe sanctions for any deliberate breaches of the rules’.

In this must-read article, the authors look at the various elements involved, including best practice, the court’s expectations and the future of disclosure. They offer valuable practical advice, presented in an accessible and digestible way—find it here.
Issue: 8023 / Categories: Legal News , Disclosure , Profession , CPR
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll