header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Is the Law Society’s win on legal aid an ‘unfortunate precedent’?

08 March 2024
Issue: 8062 / Categories: Legal News , Judicial review , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
162783

The Law Society’s judicial review win against the Lord Chancellor on criminal legal aid has left Professor Graham Zellick CBE KC ‘uncomfortable’, he writes in this week’s NLJ

Professor Zellick takes the view that all the Law Society’s claims bar one ‘should have been pronounced non-justiciable and dismissed’—even though he supports judicial review ‘as a wholly beneficial regime’ and would also like to see higher fees for legal aid work. 

He explains his view in this insightful article, making reference to the Wednesbury principle on irrationality and the 1977 Tameside case on the duty to make adequate inquiries.

Zellick, a senior bencher, former reader of the Middle Temple and Honorary Fellow of Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge, writes: ‘This decision leaves me uncomfortable. It is difficult to see where this approach ends or how government can carry out its complex tasks if it is to be micromanaged by the courts and if considerable resources have to be expended on defending itself in court’.

 

Issue: 8062 / Categories: Legal News , Judicial review , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

1 Hare Court—Peter Mitchell KC & Amber Sheridan

1 Hare Court—Peter Mitchell KC & Amber Sheridan

Leading family law set strengthens ranks with high-profile additions

Thackray Williams—Jennifer Nicol

Thackray Williams—Jennifer Nicol

Firm bolsters commercial team with senior employment partner hire

Irwin Mitchell—Vijay Bange

Irwin Mitchell—Vijay Bange

Head of construction and engineering team appointed

NEWS
Proposed legislation to tighten the rules on pooled client accounts would place ‘substantial’ burdens on solicitors, the Law Society has warned
Increasing numbers of family mediators are cutting back on legal aid work or leaving the sector altogether due to low fees—creating a supply shortfall for low-income families
Lawyers acting in cases funded by damages-based agreements (DBAs) cannot claim their share of the damages if no damages are awarded, the High Court has clarified
Lawyers have given a cautious welcome to a Ministry of Justice decision to increase Crown Court sitting days
Barristers have been targeted with death threats, rape threats, threats to their family members, physical surveillance and threats from politicians, chair of the Bar Barbara Mills KC has reported
back-to-top-scroll