header-logo header-logo

23 July 2020
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Litigating through lockdown

Highlights from commercial litigators’ COVID diaries

Commercial litigators share their experiences of coping with the pandemic, in a special report in NLJ this week.

‘As part of what has proved to be the largest justice sector pilot ever conducted in this country, the commercial courts kept on top of their caseload when many comparable jurisdictions shut down,’ journalist Grania Langdon-Down writes.

According to the Commercial Court Users Group (CCUG), remote hearings were considered impractical in only four trials up to June (for comparison, there were 60 hearings in April), and there is ‘almost no backlog of work’. This success may lead to lasting change. Mrs Justice Cockerill told the CCUG’s June meeting that judges, court staff and court users are ‘actively’ considering whether to keep remote, or partly remote, hearings as a default, or at least ‘often used’, option for some types of hearings.

Commercial litigators say they have been kept busy, and there is likely to be a deluge of pandemic-related commercial disputes ahead. However, the surrounding legal landscape has changed―City law firms have reduced working hours, made redundancies and cut back on expenditure.

David Greene, senior partner, Edwin Coe, says non-contentious work has dropped but dispute resolution continues to be busy, with two ‘very large group claims on insurance coverage issues arising from the lockdown’ and various claims regarding contract frustration and force majeure.

Joanna Ludlam, partner, Baker McKenzie, reports suffering some ‘Zoom fatigue’ but has also enjoyed the break from commuting as well as the ‘more candid and caring interactions’ with clients. She has seen fewer new internal investigations being started but more requests for advice concerning crisis management and COVID-related regulations.

Looking ahead, litigation funding will be a key issue as businesses reduce their budgets. Susan Dunn of Harbour Litigation says she is already receiving requests from lawyers ‘planning ahead for their clients’.

Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll