header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Litigating through lockdown

23 July 2020
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
Highlights from commercial litigators’ COVID diaries

Commercial litigators share their experiences of coping with the pandemic, in a special report in NLJ this week.

‘As part of what has proved to be the largest justice sector pilot ever conducted in this country, the commercial courts kept on top of their caseload when many comparable jurisdictions shut down,’ journalist Grania Langdon-Down writes.

According to the Commercial Court Users Group (CCUG), remote hearings were considered impractical in only four trials up to June (for comparison, there were 60 hearings in April), and there is ‘almost no backlog of work’. This success may lead to lasting change. Mrs Justice Cockerill told the CCUG’s June meeting that judges, court staff and court users are ‘actively’ considering whether to keep remote, or partly remote, hearings as a default, or at least ‘often used’, option for some types of hearings.

Commercial litigators say they have been kept busy, and there is likely to be a deluge of pandemic-related commercial disputes ahead. However, the surrounding legal landscape has changed―City law firms have reduced working hours, made redundancies and cut back on expenditure.

David Greene, senior partner, Edwin Coe, says non-contentious work has dropped but dispute resolution continues to be busy, with two ‘very large group claims on insurance coverage issues arising from the lockdown’ and various claims regarding contract frustration and force majeure.

Joanna Ludlam, partner, Baker McKenzie, reports suffering some ‘Zoom fatigue’ but has also enjoyed the break from commuting as well as the ‘more candid and caring interactions’ with clients. She has seen fewer new internal investigations being started but more requests for advice concerning crisis management and COVID-related regulations.

Looking ahead, litigation funding will be a key issue as businesses reduce their budgets. Susan Dunn of Harbour Litigation says she is already receiving requests from lawyers ‘planning ahead for their clients’.

Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll