header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Perils of business interruption policies

14 May 2020
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Businesses seeking insurance payouts for losses caused by COVID-19 may come up against interesting defences on causation points, barristers say.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Theo Barclay and Joshua Munro, both of Hailsham Chambers, outline a variety of practical issues for lawyers advising on business interruption claims. For example, a key issue will be ‘whether the proximate cause of loss is the worldwide restrictions caused by COVID-19 or the UK government’s response to it’. If the latter, the value of claims by companies with international supply chains will be reduced because they would have been disrupted in any event.

The 5 March, when the pandemic became a ‘notifiable disease’, will be a significant date for businesses who source products from China―losses occurring before then may be excluded. Lawyers should also note that ‘mitigation of loss is likely to prove one of the most hostile battlegrounds’ in coronavirus litigation.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll