header-logo header-logo

14 May 2020
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Perils of business interruption policies

Businesses seeking insurance payouts for losses caused by COVID-19 may come up against interesting defences on causation points, barristers say.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Theo Barclay and Joshua Munro, both of Hailsham Chambers, outline a variety of practical issues for lawyers advising on business interruption claims. For example, a key issue will be ‘whether the proximate cause of loss is the worldwide restrictions caused by COVID-19 or the UK government’s response to it’. If the latter, the value of claims by companies with international supply chains will be reduced because they would have been disrupted in any event.

The 5 March, when the pandemic became a ‘notifiable disease’, will be a significant date for businesses who source products from China―losses occurring before then may be excluded. Lawyers should also note that ‘mitigation of loss is likely to prove one of the most hostile battlegrounds’ in coronavirus litigation.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll