header-logo header-logo

14 May 2020
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Perils of business interruption policies

Businesses seeking insurance payouts for losses caused by COVID-19 may come up against interesting defences on causation points, barristers say.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Theo Barclay and Joshua Munro, both of Hailsham Chambers, outline a variety of practical issues for lawyers advising on business interruption claims. For example, a key issue will be ‘whether the proximate cause of loss is the worldwide restrictions caused by COVID-19 or the UK government’s response to it’. If the latter, the value of claims by companies with international supply chains will be reduced because they would have been disrupted in any event.

The 5 March, when the pandemic became a ‘notifiable disease’, will be a significant date for businesses who source products from China―losses occurring before then may be excluded. Lawyers should also note that ‘mitigation of loss is likely to prove one of the most hostile battlegrounds’ in coronavirus litigation.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll