header-logo header-logo

14 May 2020
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Commercial , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Perils of business interruption policies

Businesses seeking insurance payouts for losses caused by COVID-19 may come up against interesting defences on causation points, barristers say.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Theo Barclay and Joshua Munro, both of Hailsham Chambers, outline a variety of practical issues for lawyers advising on business interruption claims. For example, a key issue will be ‘whether the proximate cause of loss is the worldwide restrictions caused by COVID-19 or the UK government’s response to it’. If the latter, the value of claims by companies with international supply chains will be reduced because they would have been disrupted in any event.

The 5 March, when the pandemic became a ‘notifiable disease’, will be a significant date for businesses who source products from China―losses occurring before then may be excluded. Lawyers should also note that ‘mitigation of loss is likely to prove one of the most hostile battlegrounds’ in coronavirus litigation.

RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll