header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Prepare for the rising number of work-from-home claims

21 June 2024
Issue: 8076 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Employment , Tribunals , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
177932

Flexible working features in an increasing number of employment law claims, write Rachel Crasnow KC and Imogen Brown, of Cloisters Chambers, in this week’s NLJ

Moreover, changes to the law on the right to work from home where feasible are likely to be proposed, should Labour win the general election.

The message for employers, therefore, is loud and clear: make sure you know what you’re doing on flexible working.

Crasnow and Brown, both specialist discrimination law counsel, look at the law as it currently stands, covering the most recent cases in this area, and look ahead to possible developments after the election.

Using a Q&A format, they provide a practical guide on what to do when presented with flexible working requests, and how a case might play out at tribunal, for example, ‘My childcare responsibilities mean I need to work from home’, ‘health reasons mean I need to work from home’, or ‘I work just as productively at home so why should I come in?’

Crasnow and Brown write: ‘Amid current political and legal ambiguity, one thing remains certain: work-from-home claims are on the rise, and practitioners need to prepare for the fallout that will result.’

They recommend employers and employees, and their representatives, stay updated on emerging case law in this area, as well, of course, as any legislative developments.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll