header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
02 October 2020
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Redundancy on furlough

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Furloughed employees who are subsequently made redundant should not lose out on redundancy pay, under legislation in force since 31 July

Writing in NLJ this week, Mills & Reeve lawyer Charles Pigott discusses the regulations and their impact on redundancy pay. While they have gone some way to clarifying the application of the rules on calculating a week’s pay to furloughed employees, Pigott says ‘their very complexity underlines the fact that these rules are unnecessarily elaborate’. See here.

Issue: 7904 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Employment
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES
 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Speechlive LogoClick to know more
Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Employment law’s four-point check
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
NLJ this week: Privacy meets the courtroom
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
NLJ this week: Auditors tighten the disclosure screws
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
NLJ this week: Telecoms tenants caught in a legal gap
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
NLJ this week: Due process holds the line

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll