header-logo header-logo

Moving on from furlough

30 September 2020 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Employment , Covid-19
printer mail-detail
28457
Charles Pigott discusses government moves to protect furloughed employees’ redundancy pay

In brief

  • Emergency legislation took effect on 31 July which aims to prevent furloughed employees losing out on statutory redundancy pay.
  • The new legislation also applies to other statutory entitlements due on termination of employment.

The Employment Rights Act 1996 (Coronavirus, Calculation of Week’s Pay) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/814) (the regulations) were made on 29 July and came into effect on 31 July. That was the day before government funding for the wage costs of furloughed staff started to be reduced.

The explanatory notes state that the regulations seek to ensure ‘for the benefit of furloughed employees whose employment is terminated, that the calculation of statutory entitlements relating to termination is based on their normal pay, rather than their furlough pay’. The government was concerned that without these regulations, there might be some circumstances in which a furloughed employee’s statutory entitlements could be calculated at 80% of normal pay, the minimum level of pay guaranteed under the Coronavirus Job Retention

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll