header-logo header-logo

30 September 2020 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Employment , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Moving on from furlough

28457
Charles Pigott discusses government moves to protect furloughed employees’ redundancy pay

In brief

  • Emergency legislation took effect on 31 July which aims to prevent furloughed employees losing out on statutory redundancy pay.
  • The new legislation also applies to other statutory entitlements due on termination of employment.

The Employment Rights Act 1996 (Coronavirus, Calculation of Week’s Pay) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/814) (the regulations) were made on 29 July and came into effect on 31 July. That was the day before government funding for the wage costs of furloughed staff started to be reduced.

The explanatory notes state that the regulations seek to ensure ‘for the benefit of furloughed employees whose employment is terminated, that the calculation of statutory entitlements relating to termination is based on their normal pay, rather than their furlough pay’. The government was concerned that without these regulations, there might be some circumstances in which a furloughed employee’s statutory entitlements could be calculated at 80% of normal pay, the minimum level of pay guaranteed under the Coronavirus Job Retention

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll