header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Ten years of philosophical belief

13 November 2020
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Profession
printer mail-detail
31632
What is the meaning of ‘philosophical belief’ for the purposes of employment law?

Pacifism, ethical veganism, democratic socialism, spiritualism and belief in life after have all been considered by the courts in this context in the past ten years. It’s a fascinating area of the law.

However, the criteria set a decade ago by Mr Justice Burton―in the 2010 case brought by the so-called Oxford Green Warrior (Grainger plc v Nicholson)―have stood the test of time.

Writing in NLJ this week, John Bowers QC, Principal of Brasenose College, Oxford, who acted in Grainger, looks at the parameters of philosophical belief, and the development of the law since this seminal case.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll