header-logo header-logo

15 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , ADR
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The full implications of Churchill & why Halsey had to go

151503
Tony Allen, solicitor, mediator and senior consultant to CEDR, provides in-depth commentary on Churchill, which overturned Halsey, in this week’s NLJ

The overturning of Halsey, where it was held 18 years ago that for a court to order parties to mediate would infringe their Art 6 right to a fair trial, is a momentous occasion for dispute resolution lawyers.

Allen writes: ‘We can learn from facts that emerged from the appeal in Churchill where matters went somewhat astray in Halsey.’ He reflects on Halsey, ‘There is no doubt that the impact of this decision was widespread and profound. Courts that had been making ADR Orders—or said they wanted to—ceased to do so.’

Allen explores Churchill, examining questions raised and answered within the judgment by the Master of the Rolls. Finally, he looks at the future implications of this highly important case. 

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , ADR
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll