header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: The Lucy Letby Inquiry & different forms of inquiries

17 November 2023
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
146637
The decision by the government to make the Lucy Letby Inquiry non-statutory and then to change its mind and make the inquiry statutory is the subject of Red Lion Chambers barristers Sailesh Mehta’s and Tom Davies’s article in this week’s NLJ

Mehta and Davies examine the main difference between statutory and non-statutory inquiries, and the advantages and disadvantages. They look at testimony and documents, turnaround times, evidence on oath and impartial chairs.

The authors write: ‘Inquiries have a number of important functions. They establish facts; determine accountability; allay public disquiet and restore public confidence; provide catharsis for those affected; articulate lessons which can be learned and make policy recommendations to prevent recurrence.’ 

Issue: 8049 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll