header-logo header-logo

19 July 2024
Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Tort , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The reign in Spain when Brits complain

182210

As thoughts turn to holidays, bear in mind the Court of Appeal decision in Nicholls v Mapfre

Writing in this week’s NLJ, Andrew Young, 3 Hare Court, analyses the outcome and reasoning in this case, which concerned a scooter accident and other torts in Spain followed by claims brought in England against Spanish insurance company Mapfre.

The question before the court was that of interest—under which jurisdictional regime was the applicable interest rate? Was it the higher rate stipulated by Spanish law, or the lower rate in England. The answer depended on whether the award of interest was substantive or procedural.  

Young writes: ‘The effect of making an award of interest in accordance with the provisions of Spanish Act 50/1980 had been almost to double the overall value of the claims in those two cases in which the figures were disclosed.’ 

Issue: 8080 / Categories: Legal News , Tort , Personal injury , Damages
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll