header-logo header-logo

03 May 2024
Issue: 8069 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Artificial intelligence , Technology , Bias , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The relentless creep of algorithmic discrimination

169508

Algorithmic discrimination is on the rise and it’s a serious problem, writes Dr Sebastian Smart in this week’s NLJ. It’s a fascinating insight into a global phenomenon

Smart argues that we need to work towards cross-jurisdictional solutions such as universally accepted definitions and frameworks.

Smart, a research fellow at Anglia Ruskin University’s Centre for Access to Justice and Inclusion, explains how algorithmic discrimination can occur, what damage it can cause, and how different jurisdictions across the world have widely differing approaches to regulation.

He notes that the ‘Post Office Horizon scandal has highlighted the extensive damage that can occur when technology is misapplied’. Yet ‘cases of bias and disparity arising from algorithmic decision-making’ are increasingly frequent. Smart writes: ‘These processes often rely on complex algorithms found in systems that impact aspects of our lives, ranging from social media algorithms to credit scoring methods, job recruitment procedures and even law enforcement practices.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll