header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Warrantless entry & other police powers in the Criminal Justice Bill

161579
The Criminal Justice Bill expands police powers against citizens in some worrying ways, according to Neil Parpworth of Leicester De Montfort Law School, in this week’s NLJ

Parpworth covers, in particular, clause 22 (seizing of bladed articles and suspected stolen goods) and clause 24 (warrantless entry and search). He explores whether the powers within the clauses could be misused and whether sufficient safeguards exist.

He writes: ‘The language the Bill uses in clauses 22 and 24 reflects familiar concepts and terminology in existing police powers. Nevertheless, what is being proposed amounts to a significant extension of such powers in the contexts of knife and acquisitive crime.’

The Bill is currently on its way through the House of Commons. Parpworth looks at the potential implications of these and some other clauses and at commentary thus far during parliamentary debates.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

NLJ Career Profile: Hugo Plowman, Mishcon de Reya

From global fraud cases to fishing off-grid, Mishcon de Reya’s chair of dispute resolution Hugo Plowman discusses mentors, management switching off

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec, Ciara Florey, Alice Ferguson & Ruth Wynn

Maguire Family Law announces partner promotion and new hires amid a record year for enquiries

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis—Rebecca Parry & Hannah Gamble

Switalskis wills and probate team extends reach with two appointments

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll