header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Warrantless entry & other police powers in the Criminal Justice Bill

01 March 2024
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Human rights
printer mail-detail
161579
The Criminal Justice Bill expands police powers against citizens in some worrying ways, according to Neil Parpworth of Leicester De Montfort Law School, in this week’s NLJ

Parpworth covers, in particular, clause 22 (seizing of bladed articles and suspected stolen goods) and clause 24 (warrantless entry and search). He explores whether the powers within the clauses could be misused and whether sufficient safeguards exist.

He writes: ‘The language the Bill uses in clauses 22 and 24 reflects familiar concepts and terminology in existing police powers. Nevertheless, what is being proposed amounts to a significant extension of such powers in the contexts of knife and acquisitive crime.’

The Bill is currently on its way through the House of Commons. Parpworth looks at the potential implications of these and some other clauses and at commentary thus far during parliamentary debates.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll