header-logo header-logo

16 July 2021
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality , Human rights
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: What's in a name?

52819
Rebranding the past―when historical ideals fall short of modern values

Hardwicke Chambers is changing its name due to the problematic decisions of the eighteenth-century Attorney General after which it is named.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, John Gould, senior partner, Russell-Cooke, looks into the reasons for the name-change―the Earl of Hardwicke’s decision that enslaved people should legally be considered the property of their ‘owners’ even if they set foot on English soil or were baptised.

Hardwicke Chambers will henceforth be known as Gatehouse Chambers.

Issue: 7941 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality , Human rights
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll