header-logo header-logo

16 July 2021 / John Gould
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Rebranding the past

52819
What’s in a name? John Gould on when historical ideals fall out of step with the modern day

‘That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet’

Barristers have always practised alone. Once upon a time, the only collective identity required was that provided by the name of the head of chambers or their address. A grand head of chambers might produce some reflected glory for those toiling away below, but generally addresses provided more continuity and allowed even the slowest-witted solicitor to avoid becoming muddled about where to send their briefs.

Addresses have always seemed like a safe, if somewhat unimaginative, bet. They tend to include words like ‘new’ or ‘old’, reference uncontroversial building materials such as stone or brick, pick up institutional references like the King’s Bench or the Crown Office, or deploy architectural features such as fountains, pumps or gardens. Outside of the Inns, barristers might have to make do with everyday addresses.

Slowly, however, the fact that barristers undertaking similar

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll