header-logo header-logo

Rebranding the past

16 July 2021 / John Gould
Issue: 7941 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail
52819
What’s in a name? John Gould on when historical ideals fall out of step with the modern day

‘That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet’

Barristers have always practised alone. Once upon a time, the only collective identity required was that provided by the name of the head of chambers or their address. A grand head of chambers might produce some reflected glory for those toiling away below, but generally addresses provided more continuity and allowed even the slowest-witted solicitor to avoid becoming muddled about where to send their briefs.

Addresses have always seemed like a safe, if somewhat unimaginative, bet. They tend to include words like ‘new’ or ‘old’, reference uncontroversial building materials such as stone or brick, pick up institutional references like the King’s Bench or the Crown Office, or deploy architectural features such as fountains, pumps or gardens. Outside of the Inns, barristers might have to make do with everyday addresses.

Slowly, however, the fact that barristers undertaking similar

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll