header-logo header-logo

01 March 2019
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Criminal
printer mail-detail

No deal: a good deal for criminals?

Criminal justice co-operation will ‘immediately cease’ following a no-deal Brexit

A no-deal Brexit could make the UK a ‘safe haven’ for international criminals due to relaxed safeguards, solicitors have warned.

The UK currently co-operates with the other 27 EU countries to catch and prosecute criminals and terrorists, sharing data and investigations. Once the UK leaves, however, unless a deal governing criminal justice terrorism is in place, the many agreements facilitating this co-operation will cease to apply.

Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said this week that no deal would make it ‘harder to investigate cross-border crime, harder to arrest suspects and remove them to face justice, harder to get compensation for victims.

‘At the moment of departure, when it comes to criminal justice, all manner of issues will be left unresolved and solicitors will have to pick their way through 27 different justice systems instead of just one – the EU’s’.

The UK will no longer, for example, be able to use the European Arrest Warrant (EAW), which speeds up requests by one member state to another for the surrender of accused or convicted people; the European Investigation Order (EIO), which facilitates the gathering of evidence in another member state of the EU; Europol, which supports member states’ responses to cross-border crime; and EU judicial co-operation unit (Eurojust), which co-ordinates investigation and prosecution of cross border crime.

Blacklaws said: ‘If we leave the EU without a deal, the era of unprecedented international security and criminal justice co-operation which we’ve enjoyed as a member state will immediately cease.

‘Under the EAW criminals can easily be repatriated to their home state, but if the UK exits without a deal we may end up relying on a treaty from the 1950s. The British people may not be forgiving if the UK becomes a safe haven for criminals from across the EU27.’

The 1957 European Extradition Convention process, which Switzerland still sometimes uses, is ‘lengthy, costly and taxpayers will end up footing the bill’, she said.

The Law Society published a guidance paper for solicitors this week, ‘No-deal Brexit criminal justice co-operation’.

Issue: 7831 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll