header-logo header-logo

01 March 2019
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Criminal
printer mail-detail

No deal: a good deal for criminals?

Criminal justice co-operation will ‘immediately cease’ following a no-deal Brexit

A no-deal Brexit could make the UK a ‘safe haven’ for international criminals due to relaxed safeguards, solicitors have warned.

The UK currently co-operates with the other 27 EU countries to catch and prosecute criminals and terrorists, sharing data and investigations. Once the UK leaves, however, unless a deal governing criminal justice terrorism is in place, the many agreements facilitating this co-operation will cease to apply.

Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said this week that no deal would make it ‘harder to investigate cross-border crime, harder to arrest suspects and remove them to face justice, harder to get compensation for victims.

‘At the moment of departure, when it comes to criminal justice, all manner of issues will be left unresolved and solicitors will have to pick their way through 27 different justice systems instead of just one – the EU’s’.

The UK will no longer, for example, be able to use the European Arrest Warrant (EAW), which speeds up requests by one member state to another for the surrender of accused or convicted people; the European Investigation Order (EIO), which facilitates the gathering of evidence in another member state of the EU; Europol, which supports member states’ responses to cross-border crime; and EU judicial co-operation unit (Eurojust), which co-ordinates investigation and prosecution of cross border crime.

Blacklaws said: ‘If we leave the EU without a deal, the era of unprecedented international security and criminal justice co-operation which we’ve enjoyed as a member state will immediately cease.

‘Under the EAW criminals can easily be repatriated to their home state, but if the UK exits without a deal we may end up relying on a treaty from the 1950s. The British people may not be forgiving if the UK becomes a safe haven for criminals from across the EU27.’

The 1957 European Extradition Convention process, which Switzerland still sometimes uses, is ‘lengthy, costly and taxpayers will end up footing the bill’, she said.

The Law Society published a guidance paper for solicitors this week, ‘No-deal Brexit criminal justice co-operation’.

Issue: 7831 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll