header-logo header-logo

No discrimination by database

231389
A council’s database for homeless applicants was found not to be discriminatory against women, write Kelvin Rutledge KC & Genevieve Screeche-Powell

  • Tower Hamlets Council has sought to tackle the housing crisis by using a database to help it allocate housing to homeless applicants.
  • In Anisa Begum v London Borough of Tower Hamlets, the appellant claimed the use of the database discriminated unlawfully against her as a woman.
  • The court accepted Tower Hamlets Council’s submission that the database was not a deferral list or otherwise a means of delaying performance of the main housing duty.

In Alibkhiet v Brent London Borough; Adam v City of Westminster [2018] EWCA Civ 2742, Lord Justice Lewison famously remarked: ‘You would need to be a hermit not to know that there is an acute shortage of housing, especially affordable housing, in London; and that local government finance is severely stretched.’ That observation is especially true of family-sized temporary accommodation, which local housing authorities frequently need to discharge their

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll