header-logo header-logo

No jurisdiction for Simmons claim

17 April 2019
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

A former Simmons & Simmons’ equity partner in Paris cannot bring claims in the UK for equal pay, discrimination and victimisation, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held.

Noro-Lanto Ravisy sought to claim for acts occurring in France in the employment tribunal on the basis she visited the London office every few months. She accepted these visits were ‘ad hoc, infrequent and generally short’, in Ravisy v Simmons & Simmons UKEAT/0085/18/OO.

Ravisy claimed the firm did not fairly allocate work to women and that she was subjected to forced retirement.

Simmons & Simmons dispute the claims.

The EAT held that a Paris partner could bring a claim in the tribunal in ‘exceptional’ cases, as the Brussels I Recast Regulations applied. In Ravisy’s case, however, Mr Justice Kerr said ‘the balance comes down firmly on the French side’.

Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll