header-logo header-logo

17 April 2019
Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

No jurisdiction for Simmons claim

A former Simmons & Simmons’ equity partner in Paris cannot bring claims in the UK for equal pay, discrimination and victimisation, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held.

Noro-Lanto Ravisy sought to claim for acts occurring in France in the employment tribunal on the basis she visited the London office every few months. She accepted these visits were ‘ad hoc, infrequent and generally short’, in Ravisy v Simmons & Simmons UKEAT/0085/18/OO.

Ravisy claimed the firm did not fairly allocate work to women and that she was subjected to forced retirement.

Simmons & Simmons dispute the claims.

The EAT held that a Paris partner could bring a claim in the tribunal in ‘exceptional’ cases, as the Brussels I Recast Regulations applied. In Ravisy’s case, however, Mr Justice Kerr said ‘the balance comes down firmly on the French side’.

Issue: 7837 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll