header-logo header-logo

06 March 2019
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

No more dubious NDAs?

Tougher legal safeguards could be introduced to give workers greater protection from abuse of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).

The government is proposing to clarify that NDAs cannot prevent a worker disclosing criminal conduct to the police; ensure workers receive a clear, written description of rights before signing; and requiring that workers receive independent advice before signing a settlement agreement.

Paul Quain, partner at employment law firm GQ|Littler, said: ‘The proposals will still allow NDAs to prevent disclosure of non-criminal forms of sexual and racial discrimination.

‘This means direct discrimination, such as through not promoting someone due to their gender, would not be covered despite being one of the top issues in the workplace. The proposed laws could therefore throw up legal anomalies, with some unlawful (but not criminal) behaviour still covered by agreements, but others not being covered.’

The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy’s consultation on ‘Confidentiality clauses: measures to prevent misuse in situations of workplace harassment or discrimination’ was opened this week and runs until 29 April.

Issue: 7831 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll