header-logo header-logo

No more dubious NDAs?

06 March 2019
Issue: 7831 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Tougher legal safeguards could be introduced to give workers greater protection from abuse of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs).

The government is proposing to clarify that NDAs cannot prevent a worker disclosing criminal conduct to the police; ensure workers receive a clear, written description of rights before signing; and requiring that workers receive independent advice before signing a settlement agreement.

Paul Quain, partner at employment law firm GQ|Littler, said: ‘The proposals will still allow NDAs to prevent disclosure of non-criminal forms of sexual and racial discrimination.

‘This means direct discrimination, such as through not promoting someone due to their gender, would not be covered despite being one of the top issues in the workplace. The proposed laws could therefore throw up legal anomalies, with some unlawful (but not criminal) behaviour still covered by agreements, but others not being covered.’

The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy’s consultation on ‘Confidentiality clauses: measures to prevent misuse in situations of workplace harassment or discrimination’ was opened this week and runs until 29 April.

Issue: 7831 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Private wealth and tax offering bolstered by partner hire

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
back-to-top-scroll