header-logo header-logo

31 July 2014
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No new laws for social media crime

Peers have dismissed the need for new laws to deal with crime on Facebook and Twitter but called for more clarity on “revenge porn”.

In a report published this week, Social Media and Criminal Offences, the House of Lords communications committee concluded that existing criminal laws are sufficient to tackle offences committed via social media. It said the Communications Act 2003, Malicious Communications Act 1998 and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, along with the guidelines for applying them published by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), would suffice. However, it recommended that the DPP make it clear when an indecent communication could and should be prosecuted.

The government said in July that it might introduce laws to tackle the problem of pornographic images being posted online by jilted lovers who want to humiliate their ex. Once online, the images are impossible to remove as they are re-tweeted.

Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll