header-logo header-logo

No new laws for social media crime

31 July 2014
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Peers have dismissed the need for new laws to deal with crime on Facebook and Twitter but called for more clarity on “revenge porn”.

In a report published this week, Social Media and Criminal Offences, the House of Lords communications committee concluded that existing criminal laws are sufficient to tackle offences committed via social media. It said the Communications Act 2003, Malicious Communications Act 1998 and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, along with the guidelines for applying them published by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), would suffice. However, it recommended that the DPP make it clear when an indecent communication could and should be prosecuted.

The government said in July that it might introduce laws to tackle the problem of pornographic images being posted online by jilted lovers who want to humiliate their ex. Once online, the images are impossible to remove as they are re-tweeted.

Issue: 7617 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll