header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Michael Waterworth
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Public , Tax , Housing
printer mail-detail

No place like (a second) home

Second home owners are not well served by capital gains tax legislation, says Michael Waterworth

For capital gains tax (CGT) purposes houses are just like any other asset with one important exemption—that the gain on disposal of a person’s principal private residence is not subject to CGT. This exemption applies to a dwelling-house— which might comprise more than one building— and a garden or grounds of up to half a hectare which is about one-and-a-quarter acres. Where the size and character of the house justify it, gardens or grounds in excess of that area may be exempted.

To attract the principal CGT exemption the property must have been the taxpayer’s main residence and that connotes a “degree of permanence, continuity and the expectation of continuity” (see Goodwin v Curtis [1998] STC 475). A short stay will suffice to establish that a property is a main residence if a more permanent occupation was intended but prevented by changed circumstances, but even occupation of reasonable duration will not do if the occupation
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll