header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Michael Waterworth
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Public , Tax , Housing
printer mail-detail

No place like (a second) home

Second home owners are not well served by capital gains tax legislation, says Michael Waterworth

For capital gains tax (CGT) purposes houses are just like any other asset with one important exemption—that the gain on disposal of a person’s principal private residence is not subject to CGT. This exemption applies to a dwelling-house— which might comprise more than one building— and a garden or grounds of up to half a hectare which is about one-and-a-quarter acres. Where the size and character of the house justify it, gardens or grounds in excess of that area may be exempted.

To attract the principal CGT exemption the property must have been the taxpayer’s main residence and that connotes a “degree of permanence, continuity and the expectation of continuity” (see Goodwin v Curtis [1998] STC 475). A short stay will suffice to establish that a property is a main residence if a more permanent occupation was intended but prevented by changed circumstances, but even occupation of reasonable duration will not do if the occupation
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll