header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Michael Waterworth
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Public , Tax , Housing
printer mail-detail

No place like (a second) home

Second home owners are not well served by capital gains tax legislation, says Michael Waterworth

For capital gains tax (CGT) purposes houses are just like any other asset with one important exemption—that the gain on disposal of a person’s principal private residence is not subject to CGT. This exemption applies to a dwelling-house— which might comprise more than one building— and a garden or grounds of up to half a hectare which is about one-and-a-quarter acres. Where the size and character of the house justify it, gardens or grounds in excess of that area may be exempted.

To attract the principal CGT exemption the property must have been the taxpayer’s main residence and that connotes a “degree of permanence, continuity and the expectation of continuity” (see Goodwin v Curtis [1998] STC 475). A short stay will suffice to establish that a property is a main residence if a more permanent occupation was intended but prevented by changed circumstances, but even occupation of reasonable duration will not do if the occupation
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll