header-logo header-logo

14 February 2008 / Michael Waterworth
Issue: 7308 / Categories: Features , Public , Tax , Housing
printer mail-detail

No place like (a second) home

Second home owners are not well served by capital gains tax legislation, says Michael Waterworth

For capital gains tax (CGT) purposes houses are just like any other asset with one important exemption—that the gain on disposal of a person’s principal private residence is not subject to CGT. This exemption applies to a dwelling-house— which might comprise more than one building— and a garden or grounds of up to half a hectare which is about one-and-a-quarter acres. Where the size and character of the house justify it, gardens or grounds in excess of that area may be exempted.

To attract the principal CGT exemption the property must have been the taxpayer’s main residence and that connotes a “degree of permanence, continuity and the expectation of continuity” (see Goodwin v Curtis [1998] STC 475). A short stay will suffice to establish that a property is a main residence if a more permanent occupation was intended but prevented by changed circumstances, but even occupation of reasonable duration will not do if the occupation
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll