header-logo header-logo

No regulatory change

07 May 2014
Issue: 7605 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Government won't make changes to regulation of profession

Ministers have ruled out immediate further changes to regulation of the legal profession. A ministerial statement issued last week said options to reduce regulatory burdens would require primary legislation and therefore the government would not make any changes. The statement was responding to a call for evidence on legal services regulation last June. Justice minister Shailesh Vara said 71 responses were received but there was “no consensus”. The Legal Services Board controversially called for a single legal services regulator last year, provoking a sharp retort from the Bar Council.

Issue: 7605 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll