header-logo header-logo

No room for doubt

27 January 2012 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Judicial review , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

Keith Davies turns the spotlight onto a Thameside Tudor tiff

The Court of Appeal heard and decided an appeal on 24 June 2011 between Garner and Others (appellant) and Elmbridge Borough Council and Others (respondent), with Gladedale Group Ltd and Network Rail Infrastructure (interested parties) (Garner and Ors v Elmbridge Borough Council and Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 891). The appellant had brought proceedings for judicial review of a decision by the council as local planning authority to grant permission for development at Hampton Court station at East Molesey in Surrey, situated on the south bank of the Thames directly opposite Hampton Court Palace. Ouseley J, in the administrative court of the Queen’s Bench Division, dismissed the application, and the appellant appealed, again unsuccessfully. The judgments do full justice to the presentation and analysis by all parties of the legal issues and the planning problems involved, which are complex (maybe more so in theory than practice).

Part of that complexity comes from the fact that the appellant, Keith Garner, with a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll