header-logo header-logo

10 November 2017 / Nicholas Griffin KC
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Bribery , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail

No safe havens? Pt 1

nlj_7769_griffin

Corporate facilitation of tax evasion: the new frontier. A special two-part analysis by QEB Hollis Whiteman Chambers

  • The Criminal Finances Act 2017 includes new corporate criminal offences of failing to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion, which came into force at the end of September.
  • These are strict liability offences coupled with reverse burden ‘reasonable prevention procedures’ defences, akin to the Bribery Act 2010. They have far-reaching implications.

There is no doubt that the recent years of austerity have naturally triggered debate surrounding the adequacy of the Government’s tax enforcement methods. In tandem, the HSBC Switzerland ‘secret accounts’, the ‘Panama papers’ scandals have highlighted significant holes in the current regulatory and criminal enforcement regimes. It is no coincidence that the events in 2015 and 2016 were immediately followed by Government consultations on better tackling tax avoidance and evasion alike. This month’s striking publication of the ‘Paradise papers’ has raised similar concerns.

Following these consultations, the Government has sought to strengthen the legislative tools at its disposal to tackle

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll