header-logo header-logo

No safe havens? Pt 1

10 November 2017 / Nicholas Griffin KC
Issue: 7769 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Bribery , Profession , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7769_griffin

Corporate facilitation of tax evasion: the new frontier. A special two-part analysis by QEB Hollis Whiteman Chambers

  • The Criminal Finances Act 2017 includes new corporate criminal offences of failing to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion, which came into force at the end of September.
  • These are strict liability offences coupled with reverse burden ‘reasonable prevention procedures’ defences, akin to the Bribery Act 2010. They have far-reaching implications.

There is no doubt that the recent years of austerity have naturally triggered debate surrounding the adequacy of the Government’s tax enforcement methods. In tandem, the HSBC Switzerland ‘secret accounts’, the ‘Panama papers’ scandals have highlighted significant holes in the current regulatory and criminal enforcement regimes. It is no coincidence that the events in 2015 and 2016 were immediately followed by Government consultations on better tackling tax avoidance and evasion alike. This month’s striking publication of the ‘Paradise papers’ has raised similar concerns.

Following these consultations, the Government has sought to strengthen the legislative tools at its disposal to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll