header-logo header-logo

No whistleblowing protection for jobseekers

09 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Whistleblowing , Employment , Human rights
printer mail-detail
Job applicants are not protected as whistleblowers, the Court of Appeal has confirmed.

Sullivan v Isle of Wight Council [2025] EWCA Civ 379 concerned a job applicant who made allegations about a charitable trust, a trustee of which was on the council’s interviewing panel.

Currently, the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) only provides whistleblowing protection to NHS job applicants. Sullivan contended this was incompatible with her human rights, among other grounds. The court dismissed her appeal.

However, Lord Justice Lewis, giving the main judgment, said he would regard applying for a job ‘as capable of being treatment on the ground of some other status’.

Anna Birtwistle, partner at Farrer & Co, representing intervener Protect, the whistleblowing charity, said: ‘The judgment is particularly important in noting that a job applicant is capable of falling under “some other status” under Article 14 [of the European Convention on Human Rights] … and it clearly outlines the purpose of whistleblowing provisions in the ERA to protect the public interest.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll