header-logo header-logo

09 April 2025
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Legal News , Whistleblowing , Employment , Human rights
printer mail-detail

No whistleblowing protection for jobseekers

Job applicants are not protected as whistleblowers, the Court of Appeal has confirmed.

Sullivan v Isle of Wight Council [2025] EWCA Civ 379 concerned a job applicant who made allegations about a charitable trust, a trustee of which was on the council’s interviewing panel.

Currently, the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA) only provides whistleblowing protection to NHS job applicants. Sullivan contended this was incompatible with her human rights, among other grounds. The court dismissed her appeal.

However, Lord Justice Lewis, giving the main judgment, said he would regard applying for a job ‘as capable of being treatment on the ground of some other status’.

Anna Birtwistle, partner at Farrer & Co, representing intervener Protect, the whistleblowing charity, said: ‘The judgment is particularly important in noting that a job applicant is capable of falling under “some other status” under Article 14 [of the European Convention on Human Rights] … and it clearly outlines the purpose of whistleblowing provisions in the ERA to protect the public interest.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll