header-logo header-logo

28 May 2009
Issue: 7371 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Non-payment clampdown

Employment

Enforcement officers are to be drafted in to help individuals chase unpaid employment tribunal awards and out-of-court settlements.

Employers and employees who fail to pay employment tribunal awards will face the wrath of High Court enforcement officers under the plans, announced last week by justice secretary Jack Straw.

A Ministry of Justice report—Research into Enforcement of Employment Tribunal Awards in England and Wales—published last week, revealed 39% of people granted awards have not been paid, and only 53% have been paid in full. Respondents felt the court led enforcement process was “too much hassle”, “too expensive” or “too time consuming”.

Some 36% of claimants who had not received payment had attempted to enforce the award through the county court, and 40% of unpaid or part paid claimants did not know that the award could be enforced through the county court.

Non-payment tends to increase as the value of the award rises—26% of those awarded less than £500 received no payment, compared with 44% of those awarded more than £5,000.

The Ministry tried to tackle non-payers by extending a telephone helpline, at 0845 4568770, and launching two information leaflets advising on how to recover awards, on 1 April.

Issue: 7371 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll