header-logo header-logo

28 May 2009
Issue: 7371 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Non-payment clampdown

Employment

Enforcement officers are to be drafted in to help individuals chase unpaid employment tribunal awards and out-of-court settlements.

Employers and employees who fail to pay employment tribunal awards will face the wrath of High Court enforcement officers under the plans, announced last week by justice secretary Jack Straw.

A Ministry of Justice report—Research into Enforcement of Employment Tribunal Awards in England and Wales—published last week, revealed 39% of people granted awards have not been paid, and only 53% have been paid in full. Respondents felt the court led enforcement process was “too much hassle”, “too expensive” or “too time consuming”.

Some 36% of claimants who had not received payment had attempted to enforce the award through the county court, and 40% of unpaid or part paid claimants did not know that the award could be enforced through the county court.

Non-payment tends to increase as the value of the award rises—26% of those awarded less than £500 received no payment, compared with 44% of those awarded more than £5,000.

The Ministry tried to tackle non-payers by extending a telephone helpline, at 0845 4568770, and launching two information leaflets advising on how to recover awards, on 1 April.

Issue: 7371 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll