header-logo header-logo

26 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Norris extradition appeal dismissed by Supreme Court

Former head of Morgan Crucible, Ian Norris has lost his appeal against extradition to the US over charges of obstructing justice.

Former head of Morgan Crucible, Ian Norris has lost his appeal against extradition to the US over charges of obstructing justice.

Nine justices of the Supreme Court unanimously held that Norris could not rely on Art 8 rights to private and family life to bar extradition.

Norris, 67, and his wife are both in poor health, and he relies on his wife for nursing needs. He claimed that extradition would cause disproportionate damage to his and his wife’s physical and psychological wellbeing, therefore Art 8 of the European convention on Human Rights applied and he should be discharged pursuant to the Extradition Act 2003, s 87.

He faces allegations of arranging for incriminating documents to be concealed or destroyed and of participating in a scheme to prepare false evidence to be given to US authorities.

Delivering the lead judgment in Norris v Government of United States of America [2010] UKSC 9, Lord

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll