header-logo header-logo

26 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Norris extradition appeal dismissed by Supreme Court

Former head of Morgan Crucible, Ian Norris has lost his appeal against extradition to the US over charges of obstructing justice.

Former head of Morgan Crucible, Ian Norris has lost his appeal against extradition to the US over charges of obstructing justice.

Nine justices of the Supreme Court unanimously held that Norris could not rely on Art 8 rights to private and family life to bar extradition.

Norris, 67, and his wife are both in poor health, and he relies on his wife for nursing needs. He claimed that extradition would cause disproportionate damage to his and his wife’s physical and psychological wellbeing, therefore Art 8 of the European convention on Human Rights applied and he should be discharged pursuant to the Extradition Act 2003, s 87.

He faces allegations of arranging for incriminating documents to be concealed or destroyed and of participating in a scheme to prepare false evidence to be given to US authorities.

Delivering the lead judgment in Norris v Government of United States of America [2010] UKSC 9, Lord

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll