header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 April 2019 / Rawdon Crozier
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Notes on a scandal: freeholders & medieval robber barons (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Summing up his series on the unfairness of escalating ground rent, Rawdon Crozier proposes a way out of the dungeon
  • Could the Housing Act Trap render escalating ground rent a derogation from grant?

Part 1 of this speculative article explained the Housing Act Trap. Part 2 explores whether the trap might render escalating ground rent a derogation from grant and thus, as a matter of law, capable of being struck down.

Rule of law

Megarry & Wade (Law of Real Property, 5th edition) described derogation from grant as a free-standing and independent rule of law, an analysis endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Johnston & Sons Ltd v Holland [1988] 1 EGLR 264. It applies to all forms of grant and, while commonly associated with leases and other contracts relating to land, it is also encountered in contracts concerning:

  • Intellectual property, eg Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch) where the serving of notices by members of
    • If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Read All
    NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

    NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

    Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

    Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

    Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

    West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

    JMW—Belinda Brooke

    JMW—Belinda Brooke

    Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

    NEWS
    Read All
    NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

    The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

    NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
    Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
    NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
    As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
    NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
    In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
    NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
    A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
    Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
    back-to-top-scroll