header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 April 2019 / Rawdon Crozier
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Notes on a scandal: freeholders & medieval robber barons (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Summing up his series on the unfairness of escalating ground rent, Rawdon Crozier proposes a way out of the dungeon
  • Could the Housing Act Trap render escalating ground rent a derogation from grant?

Part 1 of this speculative article explained the Housing Act Trap. Part 2 explores whether the trap might render escalating ground rent a derogation from grant and thus, as a matter of law, capable of being struck down.

Rule of law

Megarry & Wade (Law of Real Property, 5th edition) described derogation from grant as a free-standing and independent rule of law, an analysis endorsed by the Court of Appeal in Johnston & Sons Ltd v Holland [1988] 1 EGLR 264. It applies to all forms of grant and, while commonly associated with leases and other contracts relating to land, it is also encountered in contracts concerning:

  • Intellectual property, eg Gloucester Place Music Ltd v Le Bon [2016] EWHC 3091 (Ch) where the serving of notices by members of
    • If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Read All
    Sponsored by
    London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

    London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

    Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

    Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

    Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

    Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

    Foot Anstey—five promotions

    Foot Anstey—five promotions

    Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

    NEWS
    Read All
    NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
    Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
    NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
    A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
    Your magistrates’ court needs you!
    Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
    NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
    Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
    NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
    A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
    Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
    back-to-top-scroll